THE SILMARILLION by J.R.R. Tolkien | Review

I did it: after of years of it taunting me from my bookshelf, I finally got around to reading The Silmarillion by J.R.R. Tolkien. I had the pleasure of buddy reading it with Mary Drover, which was a lot of fun. To be honest, I was a little intimidated by this book at first, so reading it alongside another bookworm definitely helped me work my way through it.

I went into this book not knowing very much about it, apart from the fact that it recounts events that took place before Tolkien’s famous trilogy. Until reading the preface I had no idea that this text was compiled from Tolkien’s unfinished writings posthumously by his son, Christopher Tolkien. Seems to me like that could be a topic for a whole different post—particularly about the ethics of this, the order in which texts should appear, etc.—so I won’t get into any of that here (but would love to hear your thoughts on it!). I think the idea of The Silmarillion being pieced together after Tolkien’s death is fascinating, although it does raise a lot of questions. I think it reveals a lot about Tolkien himself as well. He clearly had more ideas in his mind than time to perfect them on paper, more words he wanted to write than he was able to fit together into a completed text. It’s just amazing thinking about the world he created, and The Silmarillion is a testament to just how brilliant Tolkien was at constructing a fictional world.

However, just because Tolkien was a masterful world-builder does not mean that he was necessarily always a masterful storyteller. To be quite honest, I struggled to follow the events of this book and walked away with only a vague outline in my mind of what happened. There are just so many names that are mentioned briefly in passing without much context, and it’s difficult to keep track of them all over the course of a 400 page book. The Silmarillion is absolutely packed with detail, but in the same way that a history textbook is: detailed, but still overarching and vague. There isn’t much personality here, not much character development or description besides what one would find in a short story—largely because in a way this book is a collection of short stories about a particular place over time. On one hand, I admire and appreciate the scope, breadth, and relative depth of this text; on the other, I felt like I was always one step behind, trying to figure out how all of the pieces fit together and where I was in time and place. This book felt like more of a long-winded explanation than a story, which is perhaps exactly what Tolkien meant it to be. I’m not faulting the book for being expository in this way; however, I do think that it could have been written so it was less confusing for the reader. But if this book was scrapped together posthumously, can I even fault it for that? So many questions!

My favorite part was definitely the last section, where it talks about the events leading up to the trilogy and vaguely about the events of the trilogy itself. Once I felt like I was in familiar territory, it became easier to follow along. I especially enjoyed learning about the wizards and their dynamics, and that is one part where I actually wish Tolkien had gone into further detail than he did. Gandalf is such a fascinating character, yet even here I don’t think he got enough time in the spotlight. At the same time, it was really interesting to read about the events of the trilogy from a distanced, detached perspective. Tolkien mentions hobbits only in passing, and briefly explains the destruction of the Ring before moving on. There’s something odd about reading explanations of these events that are so emotionless, when the trilogy is so emotional for me.

Overall, I enjoyed The Silmarillion enough for what it was and am glad that I finally got around to reading it. I do think it would benefit from being reread, but that won’t be happening anytime soon (sorry, Tolkien!). Reading this book has made me curious about Tolkien’s other writing, and I’m looking forward to possibly picking something else up by him in the future. For now though, I think I’ll stick with The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings.

Have you ever read The Silmarillion? Would you recommend any of Tolkien’s other works? What are your thoughts on publishing texts posthumously? Let me know in the comments section below!




12 responses to “THE SILMARILLION by J.R.R. Tolkien | Review”

  1. I love the Silmarillion! There are so many wonderful stories in it, and it gives The Lord of the Rings even more layers. It’s just great. Off all his works, The Silmarillion was the one Tolkien wanted to publish the most, but he was so detail oriented that he never got the stories– particularly that of Beren and Luthien– quite right. In most cases, I don’t mind when an author’s works are published posthumously, especially in this case, when it’s the author’s son, who is extremely protective of his father’s legacy. It’s thanks to Christopher Tolkien that we have The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings at all!

    If you want to learn more about Tolkien’s Legendarium, I recommend The Prancing Pony Podcast. Two guys take a leisurely walk through Tolkien’s works, complete with plenty of Dad jokes and geek culture references.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oooh thanks so much for the podcast recommendation!! I’ll definitely check it out. (Also, love the name of it!) 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Well done! I still haven’t finished it yet 😀

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Haha thanks!! 🙂 It’s definitely a trek!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I haven’t read Tolkein for a long time (since I was 10 and polished off LoTR I think?) but in one of my classes this week we were talking about Tolkein vs. Lewis, and how Lewis shaped is world to his story and Tolkein shaped a world and then a mapped a story through it. I don’t think that I’ll be reading more Tolkein anytime soon, but he is so seminal in fantasy that I may have to reread LoTR and the Hobbit someday. Did you feel that this was a good companion?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oooh that is such a fascinating distinction between Tolkien and Lewis! And definitely true–Tolkien’s world is incredibly complex, and I think the fact that he created so many maps of his world just for his own personal reference really speaks to your point. I think is a good companion, although a very dense and slightly confusing one!


  4. Awesome review, Holly. I’ve seen it around a lot and have been curious about it but… I still need to read SOMETHING by Mr. Tolkien. 😮 😮 I got The Hobbit queued up to be read before 2020 at least. Hopefully, it’ll be a good enough experience for me to then tackle TLotR trilogy and then The Silmarillion! 😛

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you!! Yes, definitely read The Hobbit–one of my absolute favorite books! ❤ Let me know what you think of it!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I loved reading your thoughts on this – and I agree, this always felt like a ‘history’ to me – but I enjoyed it, what I can remember, it was a good while ago that I read this and perhaps I should give it a reread.
    Lynn 😀

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Lynn! Glad I’m not the only one who felt like this read like a “history” 🙂


  6. […] to some friends (old and new!) to see if people would like to read something together. I buddy read The Silmarillion by J.R.R. Tolkien with Mary Drover and The Stand by Stephen King with a friend from college, and it was so much fun. It’s nice […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: